Coexist? Don’t We Already Do That?

This popular bumper sticker is used by those who promote “tolerance” and world peace, but can those be achieved through man’s efforts?

You’ve probably seen the popular bumper sticker that urges people to “coexist.” Each letter is made of a popular symbol to indicate that Muslims, Christians, Jews, men, women, and more just need to get along. Of course, I want to live in a world where we can all get along, but I have some problems with the message behind this particular sticker.

First of all, we already do coexist. If we didn’t, then who are these stickers being directed at? Wouldn’t we all be dead? In the United States, we do have Christians, Jews, and Muslims living among each other peacefully. This doesn’t mean there aren’t ever any problems, but the vast majority of people in these groups get along quite well in our society.

Second, the message on the sticker is directed at several groups as though they cannot get along and need to cease any type of hostilities they may have. It’s true that religious wars have taken place and the ongoing Middle East crisis has mostly been fueled by religious ideas. But who is largely to blame for this? Secularists would like us to believe that Christianity and Judaism are worse than Islam in this regard. The Jews are repeatedly blamed for the violence in Israel, and Christians are often labeled as “fundamentalists” and compared to Islamic terrorists (who, according to the media, really aren’t Muslims, but part of a radical faction that has hijacked the religion for their own purposes). Think about it. How many Christian or Jewish suicide bombers have you read about? None. Because they don’t do it. How many airplanes have been hijacked by Christians or Jews for their religious causes? None.

The leftist media around the world attempts to squelch information that connects various terrorist attacks to Islam. Yet, the vast majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by Muslims. The Fort Hood shootings were done by a Muslim, as were the 9/11 attacks, and countless other suicide bombings. Do you remember the videos that played on 9/11 showing Muslims in other nations rejoicing when the towers fell? Those were quickly pulled in America, allegedly to protect American Muslims, and thankfully there were no outbreaks of violence against them (the videos can still be found on youtube). However, the media jumps at any opportunity to connect an attack to Christians. Within hours of the recent tragic attacks in Norway, members of the media rushed to label Anders Behring Breivik as a Christian but he clearly is not (a facebook page opened a few days prior to the murders where he calls himself a Christian does not make one a Christian). Nowhere in his manifesto or Internet writings did he give evidence that Christian beliefs fueled his animosity against Marxists and Muslims. It may be accurate to call him a far right winger, but not a Christian. And even if he claims to be a Christian, his actions were directly opposed to Jesus’ commands to love your neighbor and your enemy. Paul also wrote, “If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men” (Romans 12:18). Compare this to the many verses in the Koran which instruct followers to kill the Jews and other “infidels” (thankfully, many Muslims focus on other passages and do live peacefully with non-Muslims).

I’ve heard some people claim that the United States’ wars in the Middle East are examples of Christian hostilities. What a joke! It’s been quite a while since the U.S. government has been motivated by Christian beliefs. People can argue whether the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were a result of the 9/11 attacks, oil, revenge, etc., but they are not an example of Christian aggression in the world.

Others will bring up the Crusades as an example of Christian violence. While I will not defend the actions of everyone who calls himself or herself a Christian (we are sinners too), there are several problems with this claim. The Crusades were part of the so-called Holy Roman Empire’s attempt to take back Jerusalem from the Muslims who had conquered it. Also, whether they were “just wars” or not, it must be noted that this was part of Roman Catholicism and not biblical Christianity. Also, many atrocities were committed by the Crusaders against Jewish people who were not involved in the fighting. How in the world can a true Christian justify the slaughter of Jewish people? Keep in mind that Jesus and His disciples were Jewish, and nearly every passage of the Bible was written by Jews. [Note: the following sentence and video were added 3/22/16, the day of the tragic terrorist attacks at the Brussels airport.] Finally, before you try to equate the Crusades with some of the violence from Islamic terrorism, you need to have a proper perspective on these events.

There’s a third reason I don’t like these stickers. Many of the people who display these stickers are absolute hypocrites. I recently saw this sticker on a vehicle that had several other bumper stickers. One read, “Draft SUV drivers first,” while another stated, “Support your local revolution.” It sure sounds like that guy wanted us to coexist, doesn’t it? There are definitely some peace-loving people who use this sticker, but I’ve encountered far too many people who cry for peace but repeatedly spew hatred toward Christians.

It reminds me of recent claims of the “tolerant” liberals like Vice-President Joe Biden and Maxine Waters. Biden has called TEA Party members “terrorists” and Waters said that they can “Go to hell.” Other liberals, like Jason Levin, have called on their fellow party members to “crash” TEA Party rallies by attending dressed as Hitler and acting as racists or bigots just so the liberal media can denounce the movement. It’s pretty sad when someone has to create “evidence” for their position. And who can forget the “tolerant” death threats made by liberals to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and former President George Bush. But I digress. This wasn’t meant to be a political post.

When considering the world’s religions, this message is far more appropriate than the “coexist” sticker.

Finally, my biggest problem with the coexist bumper sticker is theological in nature. It places each of the religions on the same plane giving the impression they are all equal. Yet Christianity is different in so many ways. It isn’t about what we can do for God, but what God has already done for us. We don’t do good works to get saved, but we perform good works because we are forgiven. Also, Jesus claimed to be the Way, the Truth, and the Life, and said that no one could get to the Father except through Him (John 14:6). In light of this fact, I believe the design for the second image (Repent) is far more appropriate. Salvation cannot be earned by your own efforts because you are a sinner, so you will never be “good enough” to be saved. The Bible says that salvation is a gift that can only be received through faith. As the image states, “Repent” (turn from your sins) and place your faith in Christ.

There will continue to be many people who labor to bring peace in this world. While this is a noble goal, it will never be accomplished without the Prince of Peace, Jesus Christ. The Bible tells us that Jesus will return someday to rule over this world for 1,000 years (Revelation 20). Only then will this world have peace (see Isaiah 65:19–25 for a description of this time period). Even that peace will come to an end when man will once again rebel against their Creator, but their rebellion will be short-lived (Revelation 20:7–10). The battle described here will be followed by the final judgment. Those who have repented of sin and trusted in Christ will dwell with Him for eternity. All who have rejected Him will be sentenced to the lake of fire for eternity. You may think this is unfair or intolerant, but it is fair because it will be a just punishment for sinning against the infinitely holy God who is definitely intolerant of sin. Instead of being upset about it, be thankful that He is also merciful and gracious and is giving you time to trust in Him. Those who have can enjoy peace of mind since they will finally be at peace with God.

Book Review: How Do We Know the Bible Is True?

Here's a brand new apologetics book that I contributed to by writing three chapters and editing most of the others. It also includes chapters from John MacArthur and Ken Ham.

It was a real privilege for me to work on this new apologetics book, especially since there are chapters from two Christian leaders that I really look up to (John MacArthur and Ken Ham). Ken Ham and Bodie Hodge served as the general editors and I had the opportunity to check and edit the content of nearly every chapter.

This 300-page book is the first volume in what is scheduled to be a four-volume set. Each book will address 20–30 of some of the biggest questions that people have about the Bible, the biblical worldview, and science. The book is designed with the average reader in mind so the technical jargon is kept to a minimum.

The three chapters I wrote dealt with the following issues: How Should We Interpret the Bible? (with special attention to Genesis 1—11); What About the Factual Claims in The da Vinci Code?; The Framework Hypothesis (co-authored with Dr. Bob McCabe).

Here is a list of just some of the other topics covered in this first volume (along with the author of the chapter):

  • Is the Old Testament Reliable? Brian Edwards
  • Is the New Testament Reliable? Brian Edwards
  • Did the Physical Resurrection of Christ Really Happen? Dr. Tommy Mitchell
  • Is Genesis a Derivation of Ancient Myths? Steve Ham
  • Is the Trinity Three Different Gods? Dr. Jobe Martin
  • Did Miracles Really Happen? Paul Taylor
  • Are There Contradictions in the Bible? Dr. Jason Lisle
  • Polygamy in the Light of Scripture by Roger Patterson
  • Other Religious Writings—Can They Be from God too? Bodie Hodge
  • Why I Am Committed to Teaching the Bible by Dr. John MacArthur
  • How to Properly View Evidence by Ken Ham

There are several more important subjects covered in this book dealing with many of the latest attacks on the Word of God. So besides the fact that this book deals with a large number of the most recent attacks, what makes it any different than most of the apologetics books on the market? How Do We Know the Bible Is True? approaches the issues from a presuppositional point of view, whereas most works on apologetics come from an evidentialist perspective. This doesn’t mean that we don’t provide any evidence for our positions; it means we start from the Bible and show why the evidence makes sense in light of Scripture and cannot be accounted for in a naturalistic, atheistic worldview.

Another huge difference between this book and most apologetics books is that we are not afraid to take a stand on a straightforward understanding of Genesis 1–11. Most apologists out there either avoid Genesis 1–11 like the plague or they actually promote views that contradict Genesis. God has revealed the true history of the world to us in His Word, and it is only when we are willing to trust Him in all areas that we can truly claim to have a biblical worldview.

Of course, I highly recommend this book. It is extremely important for Christians to be able to defend their faith.

So is it a perfect book? Well, it’s not as good as the Bible (and never will be). Also, I’ve already found a couple of typos that I missed during the editing process (even one in my own chapter, oops), which will be corrected in the next printing. So although it isn’t perfect, I would encourage you to pick up a copy at your earliest convenience.